Invertebrate feeding ecology
Purple sea urchin feeding ecology and subsidies
Purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) are abundant and charismatic inhabitants of the intertidal and subtidal zones of northeast Pacific Coast, including the Southern Oregon Coast. The purple urchins of the Southern Oregon Coast can often be observed at low tide, inhabiting burrows. Sea urchins in general can play many roles in structuring marine communities from creating ‘urchin barrens’ to contributing nutritional subsidies or environments that promote development of local biomass and diversity. Urchins can make food available to organisms that feed on particulate matter because they are messy eaters and they minimally process consumed seaweeds in their guts (digesta), resulting in production of nutritious fecal pellets (egesta).
Fatty acids (FA) have been used as trophic biomarkers to investigate food web dynamics, particularly between primary producers and primary consumers. Because the purple urchins in intertidal burrows can obtain food by either foraging or catching loose drift seaweed (or some combination of the two) in the Coastal Trophic Ecology Lab (CTEL) we have begun our investigation of teasing out the relative importance of these two feeding modes by performing controlled feeding experiments.
We have investigated the nutritional value of seaweed (a brown, a red, and a green species) before they are consumed by urchins, the nutritional value of urchin gut contents (digesta), and fecal material produced (egesta). In these experiments, we have documented the FA profiles of the foods the urchins consume, the urchins themselves, urchin fecal material and a ‘secondary’ consumer raised on urchin fecal material.
Fatty acids (FA) have been used as trophic biomarkers to investigate food web dynamics, particularly between primary producers and primary consumers. Because the purple urchins in intertidal burrows can obtain food by either foraging or catching loose drift seaweed (or some combination of the two) in the Coastal Trophic Ecology Lab (CTEL) we have begun our investigation of teasing out the relative importance of these two feeding modes by performing controlled feeding experiments.
We have investigated the nutritional value of seaweed (a brown, a red, and a green species) before they are consumed by urchins, the nutritional value of urchin gut contents (digesta), and fecal material produced (egesta). In these experiments, we have documented the FA profiles of the foods the urchins consume, the urchins themselves, urchin fecal material and a ‘secondary’ consumer raised on urchin fecal material.
Isopod feeding ecology
Benthic primary consumers represent an essential link between macroalgae and secondary consumers. Biomarkers such as fatty acid (FA) profiles can be used to investigate trophic relationships and interactions. The isopod Idotea wosenesenskii (pictured left) is a primary consumer that is being raised on pure macroalgal diets to develop quantitative diet estimates of wild isopods based on fatty acid (FA) biomarkers in the Coastal Trophic Ecology Lab (CTEL).
Isopod FAs have been shown to vary with available algal cover in the field, but not always. There are several potential explanations for this variability, including but not limited to non-trophic drivers, differential incorporation of diet material in tissues, preferential feeding rates, or differential growth rate depending on available food quality. I am interested in evaluating diet influence on isopod tissue turnover, subsequent biomarker incorporation, and coloration in addition to FA profiles, growth, and feeding and molt rates of isopods to get a better idea of organismal conditions and trophic ecology.
To accomplish this, I collected adult isopods and am maintaining them on pure or 50:50 mixed diets of a red (Porphyra sp.), green (Ulva sp.), and brown (Nereocystis luetkeana) alga for sixteen weeks. Experimental diets were generated with freeze dried algae, which were ground to a uniform powder and suspended in an alginate solution to essentially make algae jello, removing structural differences between diets. So far, I have determined that isopods had higher feeding rates for diets incorporating the green and brown algae compared to those with the red.
Body coloration plays an important role in protection against predation. I am also interested in the role substrate vs. diets on whole body color. To test this, I maintained isopods on the before mentioned diets and placed them on either red or green plastic aquarium plants.
Isopod FAs have been shown to vary with available algal cover in the field, but not always. There are several potential explanations for this variability, including but not limited to non-trophic drivers, differential incorporation of diet material in tissues, preferential feeding rates, or differential growth rate depending on available food quality. I am interested in evaluating diet influence on isopod tissue turnover, subsequent biomarker incorporation, and coloration in addition to FA profiles, growth, and feeding and molt rates of isopods to get a better idea of organismal conditions and trophic ecology.
To accomplish this, I collected adult isopods and am maintaining them on pure or 50:50 mixed diets of a red (Porphyra sp.), green (Ulva sp.), and brown (Nereocystis luetkeana) alga for sixteen weeks. Experimental diets were generated with freeze dried algae, which were ground to a uniform powder and suspended in an alginate solution to essentially make algae jello, removing structural differences between diets. So far, I have determined that isopods had higher feeding rates for diets incorporating the green and brown algae compared to those with the red.
Body coloration plays an important role in protection against predation. I am also interested in the role substrate vs. diets on whole body color. To test this, I maintained isopods on the before mentioned diets and placed them on either red or green plastic aquarium plants.
